A bitter High Court dispute has broken out among possible neighbours around the development of a wall at a coastal internet site in a very north Dublin suburb, a situation which has attracted nationwide awareness subsequent an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed spouse and children residence at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of preparing breaches, environmental considerations, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times post about René Collier as well as the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has advanced right into a hugely publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of building will work at the internet site on Dublin Road, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a corporation director respectively, search for to develop their relatives dwelling. The situation has grown to be emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, the place growth pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of set up residents. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting constructed by their future neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted below scheduling permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each people of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their preparing authorization by building a wall outside of the boundaries of their web-site, leading to an encroachment over a Unique Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, therefore spots are matter to strict controls underneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments could have lasting ecological effects, specially in a sensitive coastal natural environment which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their preparing permission, and say the wall, which is partially built, is in the right place. Their legal crew has characterised the action as an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The few accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding so that you can preserve their perspective, an allegation that's been repeated in court docket and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal arranging disputes, exactly where sights of the sea are the two highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained dramatic endeavours via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, In keeping with sworn evidence referenced within the Irish Periods. In one account, Rene Collier waded by midsection-high drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the location Irish Situations, a picture which includes considering the fact that develop into emblematic with the intensity of your dispute. These steps were not merely symbolic; they were meant to Collect visual proof of your wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning in the sea Irish Situations reported, describing how The 2 Guys entered the water all through critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm h2o to photograph the site grew to become The most hanging descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Periods post about accountant Paul Feely famous that this kind of actions ended up cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ perception the wall prolonged into a place afflicted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was staying encroached on.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been covered in detail with the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned widely searched phrases as viewers sought to understand the background and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court read further submissions on no matter if interim orders need to be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical minute from the lawful timeline.
For the Main on the dispute can be a disagreement in excess of boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep that the wall, as built, goes beyond what was approved and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, is described as meticulous in his assessment of arranging documents, maps, and conditions connected for the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their motion is inspired by issue for environmental defense and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private perspective, insisting alternatively that it is about guaranteeing that development at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got explained their prolonged-standing relationship to the realm as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few simply just looking to establish a household home in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Exclusive Area of Conservation and say that each one will work happen to be completed based upon professional suggestions and permitted plans. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which Paul Feely and René Collier includes coming into The ocean all through a storm, do not change the fundamental facts.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how scheduling disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute about design of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description for a situation that many observers see as increasingly common. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become far more contentious.
The Irish Instances post about René Collier noted which the businessman had Beforehand been involved with neighborhood advocacy on preparing and environmental issues, nevertheless not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Times posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from really different Experienced backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Situations coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waist-significant water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments and René Collier waded by means of waistline-high water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both the physical actuality with the coastline and the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions shown determination; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive method.
Because the High Court proceedings proceed, the end result stays uncertain. The court should figure out whether the wall as developed complies with organizing authorization and whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Space of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and organizing situations. However the human element continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Stay alongside one another very long following the legal expenditures are paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over development performs at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the situation prolong beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. In addition it underscores how swiftly an area disagreement can escalate when fundamental difficulties like environmental defense and property rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of all-natural magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre on the dispute stands partly built, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized issues. Whether or not it can finally be altered, eliminated, or accomplished as prepared will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to One of the more intently viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin recently.